Thursday, April 4, 2013

Anti-Semitism

 



 

Anti-Semitism and denial of the Holocaust are on the rise. In Hungary, albeit a civilized and reflective culture, growing anti-Semitism has forced 100,000 member of the Jewish community to consider the option of leaving the country. Anti-Semitism in Europe is deeply-rooted in its culture and history. Despite major efforts toward creating a prejudice-free environment since the end of World War II, a declining economy has now made a mentality of fear, suspicion, division and supremacy to come out of its fringe shell and spread throughout the continent. In countries like Iran, hidden under the mantle of anti-Israeli sentiment, anti-Semitism has also become a part of foreign state policy of the government.

 
While living in Europe I had the opportunity to travel to some places with historical and cultural significance. One of the most meaningful trips that I took was to the Dachau concentration camp in Upper Bavaria in the southern part of Germany [http://www.kz-gedenkstaette-dachau.de/index-e.html]. It was a rainy gray day. Certain aspects of the concentration camp stood out to me. The walls and the watchtowers were threatening. As we continued to walk through the place we saw the cots where the prisoners would sleep. For every ten beds they would put up to sixteen people in one room. Next door to the bedroom was the gas chamber. The gas chamber was this empty dark square-shaped room which was more commonly called amongst the Nazi’s “the shower room.” The camp held communists, political opponents, Jews, religious minorities, Gypsies, and homosexuals. The museum of the camp was poignantly informative. There were pictures and documents reflecting the suffering of the victims and systematic efforts of a regime bent on annihilating everybody whom they would assume as a threat to their racist ideology. This experience, which was enhanced by a visit to the museum of the Holocaust in Jerusalem accompanied by Professor Moshe Sharon of the University of Jerusalem, had a huge impact on me. It opened my eyes to injustices and consequences of political systems that took advantage of peoples’ sense of insecurity and fear, promising a utopia but in reality delivering intense misery and unspeakable suffering.

 
Later, I also had the opportunity to visit the House of Anne Frank in Amsterdam http://www.annefrank.org/. Her life and experiences in the annex gave me a new perspective on life, and humbled me. Both of these experiences have helped me realize the importance of human rights and having a non-judgmental attitude towards everyone. The Holocaust was the hallmark of barbarism that lurks beneath the skin of civilization. Denial of the Holocaust should alarm us as it usually precedes the ominous resurgence of fascism in different forms.

 
My learning journey came to fruition recently when I visited Washington, DC for participation in a human rights event. During this trip I had a few free hours which gave me a chance to visit The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum [http://www.ushmm.org]. It was a memorable experience. I highly recommend a visit to the museum as it will enhance you intellectually, ethically, and spiritually. President Obama's remarkable speech while visiting the museum sums up my feelings and aspiration during my own visit:


We must tell our children. But more than that, we must teach them. Because remembrance without resolve is a hollow gesture. Awareness without action changes nothing. In this sense, " ‘never again’ " is a challenge to us all -- to pause and to look within. For the Holocaust may have reached its barbaric climax at Treblinka and Auschwitz and Belzec, but it started in the hearts of ordinary men and women. And we have seen it again -- madness that can sweep through peoples, sweep through nations, embed itself. The killings in Cambodia, the killings in Rwanda, the killings in Bosnia, the killings in Darfur -- they shock our conscience, but they are the awful extreme of a spectrum of ignorance and intolerance that we see every day; the bigotry that says another person is less than my equal, less than human. These are the seeds of hate that we cannot let take root in our heart.”



In our educational system a student generally goes through public schools without understanding the true purpose and application of the subject areas not only in daily life, but also in the scheme of history and philosophy and how our culture has been shaped by them. Students should learn how these historical facts fit into a larger and broader scheme. Some of the questions they need to consider are: How have their own lives been shaped by the lives of people hundreds of years ago? How are they a part of the human journey of the past and the future? What mistakes are a constant theme throughout our collective past, and how can we avoid making them ourselves in this age? What are the erroneous assumptions made and are we making similar errors today? What human characteristics have led to historical downfall of civilizations?


I fully believe that in our educational activities the student body should be reminded that no country, government, or political system can ignore or violate the human rights of its citizens. They should understand that respect for human rights is now categorically and undeniably a major premise of ethical discourse and international law. Students should learn that political differences are legitimate but they should not be a reason to applaud violators of human rights.


More than fifty years ago, on the ruins of World War II, the Declaration of Human Rights was ratified by the General Assembly of the United Nations. It is a monumental document that goes over every aspect of human rights and acknowledges that all human beings have been created equal, and have a need for freedom of expression. It emphasized freedom, economic prosperity, and equality for all. Respect for human rights, freedom, and the dignity of every individual human being are the most fundamental ethical concerns of all humanity.



Dr. Dirk Riedel has kindly corrected two points on my blog. I am grateful for his feedback: 

1.                 
The bedrooms for the prisoners were in barracks. These barracks do not exist any longer (only two of them were reconstructed in 1965). The crematorium building (including the gas-chamber) was called “Barracke X” and does still exist. But the gas chamber in “Barracke X” is not next door of the bed rooms. The SS built the “Barracke X” on a separate plot of the former concentration camp. So the prisoners could not see, what was going on around this building.

2.                  The first prisoners, who died in Dachau Concentration Camp, were brought to Munich and cremated there. In summer 1940 the SS had a crematorium built in Dachau because the number of dead had risen dramatically. In 1942/43 a second large crematorium (the “Barracke X”) was built with four furnaces and a gas chamber (marked as “Showers”) for mass extermination. The prisoners, who died in Dachau concentration camp mainly because of the exhausting work, the small food rations, the cruelties of the guards and the deceases in the camp, since 1943 have been cremated in the large crematorium. Also executions by hanging and shooting in the back of the head were carried out very often particularly in the last period of the war, whereas the gas chamber in Dachau Concentration Camp was not used for mass extermination. However there is some evidence, that the SS-medicine Siegmund Rascher killed some prisoners in the Dachau gas chamber during experiments with combat gases.


 Dr. Dirk Riedel
Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter
KZ-Gedenkstätte Dachau
Alte Römerstr. 75
85221 Dachau

Tel. +49 (0)8131-66997-169
Fax +49 (0)8131-66997-6169

No comments:

Post a Comment